[SDL] compiling with SDL_NO_COMPAT
wizard at syntheticsw.com
Tue Jan 3 02:10:41 PST 2012
> But, change the name to SDL2, not SDL 2.0. Change the names of all the
> add on libraries to be SDL2_whatever. Even if all it takes to create
> them is a recompile with a different .h file, change the name so they
> are not confused with the current SDL and the current SDL support
I think the distribution maintainers would be happy with this scheme,
to build the SDL helper libs from the same source, but using one time,
./configure --use-SDL12 and the other time ./configure --use-SDL20
As long as possible, i would like to see the libs still supporting SDL1.2
> Everyone, it is very important to avoid the desire to put everything into SDL.
Is there anything in SDL2.0 that you would call bloated or is there anything
that would make SDL bloated when adding it, for you ?
More information about the SDL