[SDL] SDL 1.3 status ?
pallavnawani at gmail.com
Thu Jul 28 04:18:31 PDT 2011
Exactly, SDL should sit under those frameworks, but can't, because SDL
feature set is missing some useful stuff.
For instance, Popcap framework supports rotated blitting etc ;)
(I intend to port Popcap to SDL 1.3, btw)
On 28-07-2011 11:59, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
>> I also don't understand why *everyone* has to roll it themselves, and
>> Popcap framework is living proof that adding 'Big Stupid Thing to the
>> API that pretends things aren't texture memory when they really are'
>> works magnificently well. There is no reason for SDL to still stay in
>> 1998 when the whole world has moved to 2011.
> This conversation is about to veer off the rails (and I blame myself,
> for misreading Mason's email and thus throwing gasoline on the
> campfire)...so I'm just going to point out that there isn't anything
> inherently _wrong_ with building what you're describing...it's a game
> Different developers like different things. There's nothing wrong with
> PopCap Framework (or HGE, or Unity, or UDK, etc), but they serve
> different purposes than SDL. I don't think it's SDL's place to compete
> with them on feature set. In fact, I think a great use for SDL is to
> sit _under_ those frameworks, so they can pile on features and know
> that they'll be reasonably portable out of the box.
> SDL mailing list
> SDL at lists.libsdl.org
More information about the SDL