[SDL] SDL 1.3 status ?

Pallav Nawani pallavnawani at gmail.com
Thu Jul 28 04:18:31 PDT 2011


Exactly, SDL should sit under those frameworks, but can't, because SDL 
feature set is missing some useful stuff.

For instance, Popcap framework supports rotated blitting etc ;)
(I intend to port Popcap to SDL 1.3, btw)

On 28-07-2011 11:59, Ryan C. Gordon wrote:
>
>> I also don't understand why *everyone* has to roll it themselves, and
>> Popcap framework is living proof that adding 'Big Stupid Thing to the
>> API that pretends things aren't texture memory when they really are'
>> works magnificently well. There is no reason for SDL to still stay in
>> 1998 when the whole world has moved to 2011.
>
> This conversation is about to veer off the rails (and I blame myself, 
> for misreading Mason's email and thus throwing gasoline on the 
> campfire)...so I'm just going to point out that there isn't anything 
> inherently _wrong_ with building what you're describing...it's a game 
> engine.
>
> Different developers like different things. There's nothing wrong with 
> PopCap Framework (or HGE, or Unity, or UDK, etc), but they serve 
> different purposes than SDL. I don't think it's SDL's place to compete 
> with them on feature set. In fact, I think a great use for SDL is to 
> sit _under_ those frameworks, so they can pile on features and know 
> that they'll be reasonably portable out of the box.
>
> --ryan.
>
> _______________________________________________
> SDL mailing list
> SDL at lists.libsdl.org
> http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org
>

-- 
*Pallav Nawani*
*Game Designer/Writer/CEO*
http://www.ironcode.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/Ironcode_Gaming
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Ironcode.Gaming
Mobile: 9997478768



More information about the SDL mailing list