[SDL] SDL 1.3 status ?
baggett.patrick at gmail.com
Wed Jul 27 21:24:43 PDT 2011
I think the software backends actually serve a slightly different use: a
reference to compare HW accelerated output to when porting the backend to
other systems that are hardware accelerated. Just my 2c. As far as I can
tell, the only feature excluded in the name of software rendering is the
lack of affine transformations of 2D stuff.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Mason Wheeler <masonwheeler at yahoo.com>wrote:
> I never said "ditch Linux development", I said "don't let people use the
> problems that desktop Linux has with a lack of good OpenGL driver support
> as an
> excuse to hold back the necessary removal of support for non-accelerated
> which are blocking implementation of important modern rendering features."
> Please don't oversimplify what I say into strawman versions. That's a
> serious pet
> peeve of mine.
> *From:* "jeaye at arrownext.com" <jeaye at arrownext.com>
> ***Subject:* Re: [SDL] SDL 1.3 status ?
> I wholeheartedly disagree with Mason. Ditching Linux development is a
> naive approach to SDL 1.3 advancement. SDL 1.3 is Linux's hope for better
> OpenGL support with SDL, and potentially its hope for more desktop gamers.
> SDL mailing list
> SDL at lists.libsdl.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the SDL