[SDL] SDL and friends static linking. OT
rnodal at gmail.com
Sun Sep 21 16:49:15 PDT 2008
How about the fact the I'm releasing the source code? Would that also
satisfy the license?
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Stefan `Sec` Zehl <
stefan.zehl at sdl.sec.42.org> wrote:
> Sorry, but
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 14:56 -0500, Will Langford wrote:
> > Standard disclaimer about excessive static linking and licensing issues.
> > one of the nested libraries is GPL, you have to be GPL.
> is Wrong.
> If you have an alternate download with a dynamically linked version this
> would be enough to satisfy the licence.
> But for windows this point is moot anyway, there have been many threads
> about it here, but I have not seen anyone successfully producing a
> statically linked game yet.
> Well, it also presumes that "!" returns literally 0 and 1. I've
> never seen a promise of that in any docs.
> I think Perl6 should return "42" for true, just to keep people
> from making that presumption. -- Randal L. Schwartz
> SDL mailing list
> SDL at lists.libsdl.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the SDL