[SDL] SDL and friends static linking. OT

[Rogelio Nodal]

How about the fact the I'm releasing the source code? Would that also
satisfy the license?

On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Stefan `Sec` Zehl <
stefan.zehl at sdl.sec.42.org> wrote:

> Sorry, but
>
> This:
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 14:56 -0500, Will Langford wrote:
> > Standard disclaimer about excessive static linking and licensing issues.
>  If
> > one of the nested libraries is GPL, you have to be GPL.
>
> is Wrong.
>
> If you have an alternate download with a dynamically linked version this
> would be enough to satisfy the licence.
>
> But for windows this point is moot anyway, there have been many threads
> about it here, but I have not seen anyone successfully producing a
> statically linked game yet.
>
> CU,
>    Sec
> --
> Well, it also presumes that "!" returns literally 0 and 1.  I've
> never seen a promise of that in any docs.
> I think Perl6 should return "42" for true, just to keep people
> from making that presumption.              -- Randal L. Schwartz
> _______________________________________________
> SDL mailing list
> SDL at lists.libsdl.org
> http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org
>



-- 
Rogelio Nodal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.libsdl.org/pipermail/sdl-libsdl.org/attachments/20080921/52c4f3dd/attachment.htm>