[SDL] Custom libSDL dependencies inconsistent?
Gianfranco Berardi
gberardi at gbgames.com
Tue Apr 15 22:38:12 PDT 2008
Gianfranco Berardi wrote:
> I apologize for the lack of brevity. I'll try to summarize here, but the
> rest should give context to what I am trying to do.
>
> When I build a custom libSDL (1.2.11) using gcc-4.1 and configure
> options to reduce dependencies, I get a library with reduced
> dependencies but with a dependency on GLIBC_2.4, which prevents me from
> using it on an older computer. When I use gcc-3.3, I can use it on an
> older computer, but for some reason I have dependencies on libX11 and
> libXext. Why does it configure differently just because CC is defined as
> gcc-3.3?
Of course I would find out why AFTER I spend a week trying to figure it
out and then emailing the list.
The changelog for libSDL:
SDL 1.2.11 Release Notes
SDL 1.2.11 is a minor bug fix release.
Unix Notes
* Dynamic X11 loading is only enabled with gcc 4 supporting
-fvisibility=hidden. This fixes crashes related to symbol collisions,
and allows building on Solaris and IRIX.
Nice. Now it looks like I'll need to find another way to get rid of
GLIBC_2.4 dependencies. I would rather update to the latest version than
drop back down to 1.2.10, though.
Thanks anyway. B-)
--
GBGames' Blog, An Indie Game Developer's Somewhat Interesting Thoughts:
http://www.gbgames.com/blog
Staff Reviewer for Game Tunnel, the Independent Underground:
http://www.gametunnel.com
More information about the SDL
mailing list