[SDL] Embed SDL.dll in the .exe
Edward Byard
e_byard at yahoo.co.uk
Fri Sep 28 06:28:31 PDT 2007
Because it would put many many thousands of programmers out of work.
It is job-protectionism, pure and simple.
Ed
----- Original Message ----
From: "neil at cloudsprinter.com" <neil at cloudsprinter.com>
To: sdl at lists.libsdl.org
Sent: Friday, 28 September, 2007 2:09:50 PM
Subject: Re: [SDL] Embed SDL.dll in the .exe
> so i strongly vote for static linking!
i totally agree, why cant a computer program just come as one single file you
can load from anywhere on any box with it's os.
all this installer business, drag and drop then load!
i am much heated about the way everything has to be 10 times more complicated
than it should be and no-one can give a real explanation why other than it is.
_______________________________________________
SDL mailing list
SDL at lists.libsdl.org
http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org
___________________________________________________________
Want ideas for reducing your carbon footprint? Visit Yahoo! For Good http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/forgood/environment.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.libsdl.org/pipermail/sdl-libsdl.org/attachments/20070928/90982ad8/attachment.html
More information about the SDL
mailing list