[SDL] Correct way of including SDL? last minor rant

[neil at cloudsprinter.com]

> Very strange coming from a Linux user. :-)

i'm a computer user, no specific platform.. i would be using RISC OS as it is
the only operating statem to have a sane fileing system, but even then the c
tools are a bit sucky for someone like me that just wants things to happen,
there you have to use makefiles as i dont think any form of auto whatver for
the version of gcc it uses have bee ported built. but at leat the GUI and
filesystem is sane.

> I dunno, what's harder than untarring, then "./configure" and
> "make"? Or writing primitive Makefiles?
>

admittedly i havnt tried to use autoconfigure or anything for my 
progects since
about 5-6 years ago, and then i probably didnt try hard enough, but my 16 file
c programs dont really merit using something that really just makes it more
complicated than is nessecary

>> [snip]
>> ok i'll shut up now
>
> As I have observed, very strange, coming from a Linux user.

very strange generally, i still hate all the messing around in linux or on any
computer system, seems we are owned by technology, simple and easy to use has
been obstificated (wtw?) by too many options trying to be too clever, so the
techology owns us. when you spend 3 days trying to configure something to how
you want it, you have to wonder why bother...