[SDL] Dynamically loading SDL dlls

Charles McGarvey onefriedrice at brokenzipper.com
Fri Nov 2 17:41:17 PDT 2007



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Kendrick" <nbs at sonic.net>
To: "A list for developers using the SDL library. (includes SDL-announce)" 
<sdl at lists.libsdl.org>
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: [SDL] Dynamically loading SDL dlls


> On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 08:53:49AM -0400, L-28C wrote:
>> Why is there a license anyway? It's not like anyone would bootleg SDL or
>> make their own renamed version... :/
>
> Because the copyright owners own the copyright to SDL.  Licensing it
> under the LGPL ensures they get what they want back from the project,
> while making it free for others to use (as in Free Software, capital F).
>
> GPL and LGPL software _is_ sometimes 'bootlegged', as you call it,
> and people have been taken to court over this illegal use of copyrighted
> software.  For example, _this week's_ piece of news may be of interest:
>
>  "Settlement reached in Busybox-Monsoon GPL case"
>  http://www.linux.com/feature/120629
>


I just hope the new commercial license of SDL 1.3 will allow static linking 
and be reasonably priced... or free?  Is there any info on this license yet?

chaz



More information about the SDL mailing list