[SDL] SDL with linuxthreads

Brian brian.ripoff at gmail.com
Wed Aug 8 01:10:21 PDT 2007


Are you sure its not an issue elsewhere in the program? If you omit
the system() calls, does your program still crash?

SDL_Timers can run in separate threads. Perhaps you are getting
synchronisation issues, and/or memory corruption due to improperly
shielded shared data access.

Can you show the source to a minimal example that demonstrates this?

On 07/08/07, Sam <bearchun at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is it possible that signal is interfering with SDL's timer. I'll have to test
> more, but I think if I don't use SDL's timer it works fine.
>
> But I need to use SDL's TIMER.
>
> Also, same code never crashes on a Linux system that is using NPTL (Native Posix
> Thread Library).
>
> ... Sam.


More information about the SDL mailing list