[SDL] SDL vs Allegro

[Guido Billi]

Sam Lantinga <slouken <at> devolution.com> writes:

> > - is Allegro more efficient in 2D blitting without hardware acceleration?
> 
> No, as far as I know SDL still has the best software blitters.  It's not
> a huge difference, but if you're trying to make every cycle count, I think
> SDL is slightly faster working entirely in software surfaces.

ok... good to hear...

> > - are Allegro bitmaps less expensive than SDL Surfaces about RAM usage?
> 
> My impression is that SDL surfaces have slightly less overhead.

ok... good to hear...

Thank you very much uncle Sam :D