[SDL] I have a tiny feature request

Jonathan Dearborn grimfang4 at hotmail.com
Fri Aug 3 13:17:15 PDT 2007


Hey,
 
Could the pixel access be done through macros in the SDL #includes?  Why would it have to be a function?
 
Jonny D



> To: sdl at lists.libsdl.org> From: slouken at devolution.com> Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 21:03:28 -0700> Subject: Re: [SDL] I have a tiny feature request> > > SDL_PutPixel() don't replace blitting. They're there for situations where> > you need to directly access pixels IE bitmap font engines.> > Possibly, although it's always about an order of magnitude faster to do the> pixel accesses inline rather than call a function to do so.> > See ya,> -Sam Lantinga, Lead Software Engineer, Blizzard Entertainment> _______________________________________________> SDL mailing list> SDL at lists.libsdl.org> http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org
_________________________________________________________________
See what you’re getting into…before you go there
http://newlivehotmail.com/?ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_viral_preview_0507
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.libsdl.org/private.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org/attachments/20070803/f8098f74/attachment.htm 


More information about the SDL mailing list