[SDL] Newer LGPL version

[mal content]

On 1/30/06, Sam Lantinga <slouken at devolution.com> wrote:
> > Hello !
>
>
> > > Yes, you can statically link.  No, I do not give you permission to use
> > > SDL under other licensing terms.
>
>
> > You understand me wrong, you should not give me anything.
> > I wanted just to restart that discussion.
>
> Please don't.  There's nothing wrong with statically linking SDL
> in an embedded environment, as long as you provide the object files
> for someone to relink the library with your application, if they
> have a development environment.

I distribute statically linked binaries for convenience, but this is on
a project that's entirely BSD licensed. Source and build environment
is always freely available. Is this acceptable?