earmbrust at xero-soft.com
Sat Sep 24 19:17:44 PDT 2005
Hehe, nono..I meant you won't see a difference as far as performance
(not memory usage). Using the standard SDL_mixer *functions* you'll
definitely see a memory usage difference. I still suggest checking into
the link I posted along with that message. While the implementation
will differ slightly (due to it being about OpenAL) the loading should
be nearly identicle, if not exactly the same.
>>My mistake, I misread the original post. (Work tends to make one skim
>>more than usual...sorry about that)
>>As for Mix_LoadMUS_RW: You won't notice any difference (in reality)
>>between using a standard channel, and using the pre-allocated Music
>>channel from SDL_mixer.
>Oh yes I do! Instead of decompressing a 1:45 ogg file to memory (25 MB)
>and play it as a sample, I have the 1.7 MB ogg in memory and the mixer
>decompresses it as needed.
More information about the SDL