[SDL] "safe" windows version?
will at willmcgugan.com
Sat May 22 15:06:35 PDT 2004
I think that "safe" - in this context - means that it is reliable (where as
DirectX isn't guaranteed), not the opposite of dangerous ;)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sdl-bounces+will=willmcgugan.com at libsdl.org
> [mailto:sdl-bounces+will=willmcgugan.com at libsdl.org]On Behalf Of Joel
> Sent: 22 May 2004 22:55
> To: A list for developers using the SDL library. (includes SDL-announce)
> Subject: Re: [SDL] "safe" windows version?
> So I don't have to worry about damaging my system at all?
More information about the SDL