[SDL] possible SDL license terms change?
adrinael at nuclearzone.org
Sat Aug 7 12:24:57 PDT 2004
On Sat, 2004-08-07 at 22:14, Michael Benfield wrote:
> by the way, the reason you don't have to make sure the recipient gets
> gcc is because of the exception in the LGPL that I skipped over.
> Namely, that if the necessary tools are normally distributed as part of
> the OS, you don't need to bother distributing them yourself. That's
> clearly not the case in the environment the previous person was talking
> about though.
Damn me for replying in a haste. Please disregard the other reply.
More information about the SDL