[SDL] DirectX 7?

Patrick McFarland unknown at panax.com
Thu Sep 26 05:38:01 PDT 2002

Yeah, thats what Im trying to get at. Linux (being, really, the main Free
Software OS) is still realistically ran on 486s and Pentium 1s. Though this
is a Windows argument, Linux proves a point here: Hardware that is old doesnt
die. As much as microsoftized developers try to push for new hardware, most
users cant afford it, or want to bother with it. (Windows is far from copying
choice files from /etc, and cloning your /home dir) 

On 26-Sep-2002, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> > 
> > So what's the big deal? If you want to write a (2D) game that runs
> > on low-end and older machines, use the SDL 1.x branch. No one is
> > forcing you to use SDL 2.x. (Unless, of course, having 2.x means
> > that the 1.x branch is no longer maintained with bug fixes and
> > such.)
> But it means you can't take advantage of any new features added to the
> library. Proprietary software makers often fall into the trap of not
> supporting any PC or OS more than 2 or 3 years old, forcing the user into
> unnecessary costly and wasteful upgrades. I thought the whole free
> software ethic was to be as inclusive as possible?
> Nick
> _______________________________________________
> SDL mailing list
> SDL at libsdl.org
> http://www.libsdl.org/mailman/listinfo/sdl

Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || unknown at panax.com
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd 
all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to
repetitive electronic music." --Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc, 1989

More information about the SDL mailing list