time stamped events, was [SDL] Detecting Double Clicks
gerry at c64.org
Thu Jan 17 22:01:01 PST 2002
On Thursday 17. January 2002 21:31, you wrote:
> "Ryan C. Gordon" <icculus at clutteredmind.org> wrote:
> >> do I even have to _mention_ why this is an incredibly bad idea?
> >It's good to know the sensitivity training is going well, Mattias. :)
> I'm sorry if I sound a bit harsh at times, but if people can debate
> endlessly about _utterly_ _trivial_ parts of SDL, problems which are
> no problems, without ever _thinking_ about it, how can they even
> *hope* to understand the hard parts?
Well, yea, i know what you mean. It turns out i replied a wee bit to soon,
because there's really not a problem with the wrapping-a-round of
SDL_GetTicks in the first place.. (10 - -5 = 15).
Still, you could be a bit more loving and caring ;)
Linux User #229006 * http://counter.li.org
"There is no magic" - Nakor, magic user
More information about the SDL