[SDL] Sorry, not for this forum

Joseph Carter knghtbrd at bluecherry.net
Sun Aug 18 17:27:01 PDT 2002


On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 02:27:32PM -0700, Curtis Cooper wrote:
> I apologize for posting the Blizzard related question to this form.  
> Sam has indicated it is not appropriate to discuss my list of 
> questions here.  Sorry!

He's right of course, though the answers to some of them are certainly of
interest to other SDL developers.  Perhaps if he can answwer any of them,
a reference to someplace where those answers might be found would be a bit
more reasonable than a thread on this list discussing the double life of
our friend and SDL author?

This, of course, assuming that the brass at Blizzard are willing to have
one of their employees answering such questions in public or otherwise.  I
suspect the code cleanliness question at least will be taboo.  ;)

-- 
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd at bluecherry.net>            What're you looking at?
 
"What is striking, however, is the general layout and integration of the
system.  Debian is a truly elegant Linux distribution; great care has
been taken in the preparation of packages and their placement within the
system.  The sheer number of packages available is also impressive...."

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 273 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.libsdl.org/pipermail/sdl-libsdl.org/attachments/20020818/cee9f0c3/attachment.pgp>


More information about the SDL mailing list