[OT] RE: [SDL] Windows version...

Dominique Biesmans Dominique.Biesmans at Telepolis.Antwerpen.be
Wed Aug 8 03:09:01 PDT 2001


In the benchmark on their site, they compare VectorC to Metroworks & Intel's
reference compiler, but Visual C++ is missing in that list. Maybe because
Visual C++ allready performs quite well as far as optimization is concerned?

This 'at least 100%' (or 1000% ???), can you back that with specific
benchmarks (that include Visual C++).

(BTW : 'at least 1000% means *any* program would run at least 10 times
faster, right?)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mattias Engdegård [mailto:f91-men at nada.kth.se]
> Sent: woensdag 8 augustus 2001 11:23
> To: sdl at libsdl.org
> Subject: Re: [SDL] Windows version...
> 
> 
> >(VectorC produces code that is at least 100% faster than 
> Visual C++ code or
> >Intel C/C++)
> 
> I heard it was *at least* 1000%
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> SDL mailing list
> SDL at libsdl.org
> http://www.libsdl.org/mailman/listinfo/sdl
> 




More information about the SDL mailing list