[SDL] Why not nanosleep()?
slouken at devolution.com
Tue Apr 4 11:25:11 PDT 2000
> Loren Osborn wrote:
> > The problem is that sleep(0) isn't as predictable/portable as we might
> > hope... If I remember correctly from FileNET, something like this works
> > reasonably well on WinNT, but I wouldn't trust it on Linux.
> The sleep(0) works okay on Linux (we use it in Quadra). In Windows, it
> is Sleep(0) you have to use (damn Win32, why the useless
sleep() sleeps seconds
Sleep() sleeps milliseconds
-Sam Lantinga, Lead Programmer, Loki Entertainment Software
More information about the SDL