[SDL] Re: Why not nanosleep()?

Pierre Phaneuf pphaneuf at sx.nec.com
Tue Apr 4 10:55:20 PDT 2000


Loren Osborn wrote:

> The problem is that sleep(0) isn't as predictable/portable as we might
> hope... If I remember correctly from FileNET, something like this works
> reasonably well on WinNT, but I wouldn't trust it on Linux.

The sleep(0) works okay on Linux (we use it in Quadra). In Windows, it
is Sleep(0) you have to use (damn Win32, why the useless
difference???)...

-- 
Pierre Phaneuf
Systems Exorcist



More information about the SDL mailing list