[SDL] Re: Why not nanosleep()?
pphaneuf at sx.nec.com
Tue Apr 4 10:55:20 PDT 2000
Loren Osborn wrote:
> The problem is that sleep(0) isn't as predictable/portable as we might
> hope... If I remember correctly from FileNET, something like this works
> reasonably well on WinNT, but I wouldn't trust it on Linux.
The sleep(0) works okay on Linux (we use it in Quadra). In Windows, it
is Sleep(0) you have to use (damn Win32, why the useless
More information about the SDL